Although the hoodie may have originated from monks’ robes, it is currently popular among everyone from skaters and surfers to hip-hop performers and burglars. In actuality, the majority of us have sported apparel with a hood.
As Cameron’s 2006 “Hug a Hoodie” speech illustrated, there is still a stigma attached to the hoodie as a symbol of rebellious behavior. Ahegao Hoodies frequently allude to problems like unemployment, loitering around looking for trouble, and “Not in Education, Employment, or Training” (NEET). Therefore, NEET youth represent what is perceived to be “wrong” with young people.
The unfavorable public perception of NEETs presupposes that the majority have intentionally stopped attending school, working, or receiving training and that there is a direct link between their behavior and criminal and deviant behavior.
However, there are a lot of issues with this presumption. Who are NEETs, to start with? The group initially included 16 to 18-year-olds whose jobless benefits were terminated in 1988. (Simmons and Thompson, 2011). the causes of NEET among young people. The labor market, education, and social or welfare policy are the root causes of NEETs.
Some now classify NEETs as anyone under the age of 24, which adds to the group’s diversity (Pemberton, 2008, Furlong, 2006). But more importantly, the group is characterized by what they lack or are absent from, not by their features (Nudzor, 2010). According to research, there are numerous possible explanations for why young individuals are NEET. The labor market, education, and social or welfare policy are the root causes of NEETs.
One issue is the rise in youth unemployment as a result of the tight labor market caused by the crisis (Hollywood et al., 2012, Tunstall et al., 2012). The amount of young people who are unable to obtain employment suggests that there are few jobs available to this age group in some UK locations, typically those with a history of industrial decline and restructuring.
This is particularly true for people who are less competent or interested in additional academic study. Due to growing literacy and numeracy requirements in career paths, this demographic appears to be shut out of additional chances (DfE, 2011, Nuffield 2009).
Young people are under more pressure than ever to continue their education, which has lengthened and fragmented their transitions from school to work (Roberts, 2012). The government is raising the participation age to 17 in 2013 and to 18 in 2015 since it now anticipates that students will continue their studies for longer. This can be discouraging because longer participation times may result in more people quitting (Furlong et al., 2012) lifestyle.
Benefit and service reductions make the situation for NEETs even more difficult. Since the Educational Maintenance Allowance was eliminated in 2010, it has become more challenging for young people to attend higher education or jobs, particularly in rural areas where there is less public transportation.
Additionally, Connexions, the global provider of youth information, counsel, and guidance, has either been eliminated or significantly curtailed, resulting in a significant regional variance in service delivery. Thus, support for young people who face challenging situations and, at least in part, originate from challenging homes is, at best, spotty.
According to Bynner and Parsons (2002), residing in an inner city and having a low socioeconomic position are key indicators of whether a child will be a NEET. Additionally, there are notable variances between the sexes, with pregnancy adding another challenge for young women.
Other clear markers include the level of education or training, place of residence or employment, ethnicity, handicap, homelessness, criminal activity, and substance misuse (McDonald and Shildrick, 2010). While some of these traits may fit the caricature of the hooded youngster, there are far larger concerns at play here that demand the attention of the government and society.
